Indices S&P 5007,561.7 −0.40% NASDAQ 10027,944 −1.22% DOW52,348 +0.10% RUSSELL 2K2,790.5 −0.31% S&P FUT7,583.0 −0.42% NDX FUT28,035 −1.23% VIX19.30 +3.21% TSX36,106 −0.09% BOVESPA172,458 +0.66% MEXICO IPC71,205 −0.84% FTSE 10010,903 +0.36% DAX26,750 −0.08% CAC 408,368.9 +0.09% STOXX 506,386.9 −0.19% SMI15,106 −0.29% FTSE MIB51,859 +0.10% IBEX 3520,020 +0.27% AEX1,141.0 +0.07% OMXS303,356.9 −0.07% BIST 10011,843 +0.27% NIKKEI61,142 +0.53% HANG SENG23,638 −1.55% SHANGHAI3,634.4 −0.59% CSI 3004,016.3 −0.68% KOSPI5,290.5 −0.98% TAIEX43,675 +1.35% ASX 2009,082.2 −0.71% SENSEX81,592 −0.39% NIFTY 5025,144 −0.61% STI5,231.8 −0.96% FX DXY103.41 0.00% EUR/USD1.1028 −0.28% GBP/USD1.3209 −0.20% USD/JPY159.69 −0.10% USD/CHF0.8382 +0.44% USD/CAD1.4269 +0.11% AUD/USD0.6774 −0.54% NZD/USD0.5525 −0.43% USD/CNH6.6738 +0.02% USD/TRY50.3447 +0.12% EUR/TRY55.4947 −0.22% GBP/TRY66.5168 −0.07% USD/MXN18.5230 −0.36% USD/BRL5.6666 +0.38% USD/INR94.24 +0.21% USD/ZAR16.9233 +1.14% USD/KRW1,336.2 +0.14% USD/SGD1.2877 +0.11% USD/HKD7.8455 +0.02% USD/SEK10.0729 +0.53% USD/NOK9.5748 +0.42% USD/PLN3.9928 +0.30% EUR/GBP0.8343 −0.07% EUR/JPY175.99 −0.38% EUR/CHF0.9243 +0.21% GBP/JPY210.97 −0.25% Yields US2Y4.85% −1.2bp US5Y4.96% +1.8bp US10Y5.14% +3.6bp US30Y5.47% +4bp DE2Y3.11% −0.4bp DE10Y3.39% +1.3bp GB2Y4.97% +0.2bp GB10Y5.34% −0.3bp GB30Y5.79% +0.2bp FR10Y4.93% +0.9bp IT10Y4.43% −0.7bp ES10Y3.94% +0.2bp CH10Y0.57% +1.2bp JP10Y2.87% +1.1bp CN10Y1.61% −2.6bp AU10Y5.14% +1.4bp CA10Y3.86% +4.6bp IN10Y7.31% +6bp BR10Y15.34% −10.5bp ZA10Y8.68% +3.5bp MX10Y9.30% −0.6bp TR2Y36.26% −52bp TR10Y33.52% 0bp Commodities GOLD$3,886.30 +0.03% SILVER$49.12 −1.89% PLATINUM$1,489.70 −2.02% COPPER$6.090 −1.71% BRENT$95.84 +0.02% WTI$88.56 −0.20% NAT GAS$3.230 −3.29% WHEAT593.25¢ +1.54% CORN445.50¢ +0.68% SOYBEANS1,231.50¢ +1.03% COFFEE279.25¢ +0.22% Crypto BTC$63,424 −6.95% ETH$1,740 −9.69% SOL$69.42 −10.19% XRP$0.9228 −8.26% BNB$576.35 −8.58% DOGE$0.0568 −11.79% ADA$0.1464 −12.39% TRX$0.3066 −1.70% AVAX$6.98 −15.23% LINK$8.82 −10.17%
01:00 GMT · Markets wrap ›

EU Parliament Sinks Retail Investment Overhaul by 14 Votes

Dark illustration of the European Parliament hemicycle seen from above, with 609 seats drawn as dots: 286 in amber for, 300 in silver against and 23 in slate abstained. Headline: EU Parliament Sinks Retail Investment Overhaul by 14 Votes. Tiles: retail investment directive rejected, 300 to 286, 23 abstentions, it failed by 14 votes; key information document rule adopted, 311 to 261; fees and commissions, no change for now, current disclosure and advice rules stay in place. MAJOR badge. Foreign markets desk, Saturday 14 Nov 2026. Sources: Agence Europe, Paperjam, Ouelen. Chart: MoneyTurkey.

The European Parliament has voted down the core of the EU’s retail investment reform by 14 votes, leaving rules on fund fees and adviser commissions in limbo and handing Europe’s asset managers and insurers an unexpected reprieve.

MoneyTurkey Foreign Markets Desk | 14 November 2026

Key points

  • MEPs rejected the Retail Investment Strategy omnibus directive on Thursday by 300 votes to 286, with 23 abstentions, according to Agence Europe, L’Agefi and Les Echos.
  • The text had been agreed with EU governments in December 2025 and backed by Parliament’s economic affairs committee in June.
  • A separate regulation updating the key information document for packaged investment products passed by 311 votes to 261 and can move towards adoption.
  • The European Commission said it “deeply” regretted the result and would consider next steps.

What happened

Lawmakers in plenary rejected the compromise directive that sits at the heart of the Retail Investment Strategy, the package the Commission proposed in 2023 to protect individual savers and steer more household money into capital markets. Les Echos called it a “cold shower” for the EU’s Savings and Investments Union, noting that the vote came as a surprise to most of Brussels.

The socialists, greens and the left voted against and were joined by enough centre-right and conservative members to tip the balance, Agence Europe reported. Among them was German Christian Democrat Markus Ferber, the European People’s Party’s negotiator on the file, who had backed the deal in committee. “This is not a vote against retail investors,” Ferber said. “It is a vote in favour of rules that work. We have prevented a ban on inducements.” He asked the Commission for “a lighter approach”.

The Parliament’s rapporteur, French Renew member Stéphanie Yon-Courtin, said on X that “finfluencers can say thank you” and accused French socialist and centre-right MEPs of putting political posturing before the public interest, according to Agence Europe.

Why markets care

The directive would have amended five pieces of EU financial law, including MiFID II, the UCITS and AIFMD fund rules, the insurance distribution directive and Solvency II, law firm Arthur Cox said in a client note. Its most contested part was a “value for money” test: fund makers would have had to show that their fees were reasonable against peer groups of similar products, and a product failing the test could not be sold to retail investors, Paperjam reported. There was no EU-wide fee cap.

The compromise also tightened the rules on inducements, the commissions that fund houses pay banks, insurers and advisers for selling their products. Advisers in several EU countries rely on such payments, Agence Europe noted. With the directive voted down, current rules on disclosure and advice stay in place and fees are not capped or changed by the vote, Club Patrimoine and the French savings site Ouelen said. That removes a compliance and margin overhang for asset managers, insurers and bank distribution networks, but leaves the industry without the clarity it had planned around.

What comes next

A parliamentary source told Agence Europe there are three options: approve the Council’s position at first reading, reject it and end the file, or send it back to the economic affairs committee. A referral would allow up to four months of renewed talks with member states. Law firm Linklaters said parts of the package could instead be folded into other files such as the Market Integration and Supervision Package, or the dossier could stall.

What to watch

  • Whether Parliament refers the directive back to the economic affairs committee
  • The Commission’s next steps on value for money and inducements
  • Any attempt to move parts of the reform into the Market Integration and Supervision Package
  • Formal adoption of the key information document regulation

For information only. Not investment advice.

Sources